<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PoliticalDerby.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalderby.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalderby.com</link>
	<description>Yes, the race for 2012 has begun...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No federal funding for abortions? Think again</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/09/no-federal-funding-for-abortions-think-again/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/09/no-federal-funding-for-abortions-think-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy La Mana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you thought there was no federal funding for abortions in the Senate health care bill think again.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you thought there was no federal funding for abortions in the Senate health care bill think again.</p>
<p><code><object width="384" height="172"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EC-pTv4IPSc&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EC-pTv4IPSc&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="384" height="172"></embed></object></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/09/no-federal-funding-for-abortions-think-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cannon: Six Reasons Barack Obama is Still the Odds-on Favorite in 2012</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/08/cannon-six-reasons-barack-obama-is-still-the-odds-on-favorite-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/08/cannon-six-reasons-barack-obama-is-still-the-odds-on-favorite-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Wright, Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just stumbled across a piece that I wish I&#8217;d written myself. This represents my views on 2012 extraordinarily well. Anyone who thinks Obama is guaranteed to be one-and-done is dreaming. Absolutely anything can (and likely will) happen between now and then. But to suggest Obama isn&#8217;t still favored to win reelection (as of today) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just stumbled across a piece that I wish I&#8217;d written myself. This represents my views on 2012 extraordinarily well. Anyone who thinks Obama is guaranteed to be one-and-done is dreaming. Absolutely anything can (and likely will) happen between now and then. But to suggest Obama isn&#8217;t still favored to win reelection (as of today) demonstrates the very definition of political naivete.</p>
<p>Read, comment, repeat.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/03/08/hold-for-mon-a-m-six-reasons-why-barack-obama-still-favorite/">http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/03/08/hold-for-mon-a-m-six-reasons-why-barack-obama-still-favorite/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/08/cannon-six-reasons-barack-obama-is-still-the-odds-on-favorite-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>She&#8217;s breaking up Capt&#8217;n!</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/08/shes-breaking-up-captn/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/08/shes-breaking-up-captn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Braithwaite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word from Scotty to Captain Obama.
Rep. Massa goes nuclear on Dems.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Word from Scotty to Captain Obama.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/rep-massa-blast-dems-he-was-set-up-hoyer-lied-may-rescind-resignation">Rep. Massa goes nuclear on Dems.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/08/shes-breaking-up-captn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What??? A Democrat that gets it!</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/08/what-a-democrat-that-gets-it/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/08/what-a-democrat-that-gets-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy La Mana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Bennet &#8211; D Colorado is introducing a new bill forcing reform on earmarks, Lobbyists and procedure changes to get Congress back to work.
Specifically, Bennet&#8217;s Plan for Washington Reform would:
Salaries, Spending, and Perk
* Freeze congressional member pay until there are 4 quarters of job growth
*Freeze congressional office budgets until there are 4 quarters of job [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Bennet &#8211; D Colorado is introducing a new bill forcing reform on earmarks, Lobbyists and procedure changes to get Congress back to work.</p>
<p>Specifically, Bennet&#8217;s <em>Plan for Washington Reform </em>would:</p>
<p><strong>Salaries, Spending, and Perk</strong><br />
* Freeze congressional member pay until there are 4 quarters of job growth<br />
*Freeze congressional office budgets until there are 4 quarters of job growth<br />
* End the health care subsidy for Members of Congress until health care reform passes and eliminates discrimination based on pre-existing conditions, doesn&#8217;t cut guaranteed Medicare benefits, increases coverage, and is fully paid for<br />
* Require full payment for the seat and disclose of those traveling with a Member of Congress on a charter jet<br />
<span id="more-4416"></span><br />
<strong>Lobbying Reform</strong><br />
* Put a lifetime ban on Members of Congress becoming lobbyists<br />
* Ban congressional staff from lobbying their former boss for 6 years<br />
* Ban former committee staff from lobbying their former boss or any member of the committee who was active during their time on staff for 6 years<br />
* Ban lobbyists from joining congressional staff or committee staff for 6 years<br />
* Create stricter rules for lobbyist registration<br />
* Institute penalties for failing to register as a lobbyist</p>
<p><strong>Earmark Reform</strong><br />
* Ban earmarks to private, for-profit companies and institutions.<br />
* Make earmarks transparent<br />
* Members of Congress must report all earmark requests they receive and all earmarks requests made<br />
* Earmarks.gov should list all earmarks requests, sortable by member of Congress<br />
* Hold Members of Congress accountable on earmark requests<br />
* All earmark requests above $1 million should go before the Appropriations Committee<br />
* Hold earmarks recipients accountable<br />
* Each year, a certain percent of all earmarks will be audited to ensure that taxpayer money is being spent wisely. These reports should be made public on earmkarks.gov</p>
<p><strong>Reform the Floor</strong><br />
* Eliminate anonymous holds<br />
* Require holds to be bipartisan. If not, the hold expires in 2 days. Even bi-partisan holds expire in 30 days.<br />
* Reform the filibuster in the Senate<br />
* After 3rd failed cloture vote, the minority must find a member of the opposite party or the threshold raises to 45 votes.<br />
* After the 3rd cloture vote, if the majority finds support from three members of the minority, it raises to 45 votes.<br />
* End the filibuster for motion to proceed<br />
* Require 41 Senators to show up to vote in order to block cloture, or else it&#8217;s invoked</p>
<p><strong>Campaign Finance Reform</strong><br />
* Support the Schumer/Van Hollen campaign finance bill, which would require Chief Executive Officers to stand by their ads, quick disclosure and sunshine rules, restrictions on foreign corporations and TARP recipients, and codifying coordination rules.<br />
* Support a constitutional amendment allowing Congress to regulate contributions and expenditures.</p>
<p>On March 3rd, Bennet delivered a speech on the floor of the Senate on the Plan for Washington Reform.</p>
<p>Watch it here:</p>
<p><code><object width="320" height="192"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rE_0X-0fwHI&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rE_0X-0fwHI&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="192"></embed></object></code></p>
<p>Now watch as his Democrat brethren eat him alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/08/what-a-democrat-that-gets-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who said it?</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/06/who-said-it/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/06/who-said-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Braithwaite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I&#8217;m not going to talk about politics today.&#8221;
You&#8217;ll never guess.
Click &#8220;Read more&#8221; to find the answer.

ANSWER
You could have knocked me over with a feather!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;I&#8217;m not going to talk about politics today.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><em>You&#8217;ll never guess.</em></p>
<p>Click &#8220;Read more&#8221; to find the answer.<br />
<span id="more-4408"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2010/March/05/Patersn_future-05Mar10.html">ANSWER</a></p>
<p>You could have knocked me over with a feather!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/06/who-said-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constitutional amendment to limit federal spending?</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/05/constitutional-amendment-to-limit-federal-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/05/constitutional-amendment-to-limit-federal-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy La Mana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Representatives Mike Pence and Jeb Hensarling appeared Wednesday on “The Kudlow Report” to discuss their new plan to pass a constitutional amendment to limit federal spending.

The rapid pace of growth of the federal government has increased 24.7% from 19.9% of the economy. That is the highest level since World War II. The debt accrued in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Representatives Mike Pence and Jeb Hensarling appeared Wednesday on “The Kudlow Report” to discuss their new plan to pass a constitutional amendment to limit federal spending.</p>
<p><code><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xdYhnWScGKw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xdYhnWScGKw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></code></p>
<p>The rapid pace of growth of the federal government has increased 24.7% from 19.9% of the economy. That is the highest level since World War II. The debt accrued in the past five years, is the total of debt summed up from President George Washington to Bill Clinton.</p>
<p>Read the Wall Street Journal article <a href="http://mikepence.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=3936&amp;Itemid=92">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/05/constitutional-amendment-to-limit-federal-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid&#8217;s election is lost</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/05/harry-reids-election-is-lost/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/05/harry-reids-election-is-lost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Fountain, Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Clips and Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can&#8217;t make this stuff up:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t make this stuff up:</p>
<p><object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LC211h9AY-4&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LC211h9AY-4&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/05/harry-reids-election-is-lost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the Boomers do it?</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/04/can-the-boomers-do-it/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/04/can-the-boomers-do-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red State Eddio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The key question is – “do what?” That’s the critical fork in the road we face: can the currently elected cadre of leaders composed mainly of Boomers manage the affairs of state prudently, or do they tank the very country they have siphoned from over the last 60 years?
I’m on the leading edge of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key question is – “do what?” That’s the critical fork in the road we face: can the currently elected cadre of leaders composed mainly of Boomers manage the affairs of state prudently, or do they tank the very country they have siphoned from over the last 60 years?</p>
<p>I’m on the leading edge of the Xer age. And I’ve been convinced since my early years that things will not perpetually get better and better and better in our country, especially not with choices, patterns, and lifestyles that do not reward thrift, restraint, modesty, and patience. When I examine my elder brethren, I am left wondering if their lasting legacy upon this great land will be one which will resign them to the doghouse of historical judgment.</p>
<p>Boomers are poised to leave a determinative mark on their country. The question is what kind.</p>
<p><span id="more-4376"></span></p>
<p>Compare the Boomers with the Builders generation. The Builders&#8217; formative years, when their impressions of the world were being anchored in the wet cement of youth, consisted of experiences of tremendous loss and hardship – the Depression and successive recession of the 1930’s, followed by World War 2. </p>
<p>People had no choice but to learn the values of thrift, restraint, modesty, and character. There was no margin for reckless living without consequences. Margins were more than a line on a paper; they were rules to keep life in perspective. People retained an accurate view of their humanity—the clay feet that kept them grounded in a truthful, even if slightly harsh, view of life. </p>
<p>And yet, to have survived, endured, and then allowed to thrive after WW2 probably made it feel like they were being given a new lease on life. The future was a confident one, because the values they had learned through the fire were now in a position to pay off. The trials that started their life gave way to the optimism that followed. </p>
<p>The Boomers did not have it the same way. Their early years were full of bounty, plenty, even opulence by the world’s standards. They reveled and regaled in their abundance, and became consumed by triviality to where it became a staple of their life, a defining more of their generation. They had the &#8216;luxury&#8217; of being radicalists, socialists, Marxists, anarchists, or whatever-ists because there was a thick, soft bottom known as prosperity that gave them the margin to experiment with all kinds of whacky, unrealistic philosophies on life – and get away with it, at least for a long time. If you’re leaping off a steep deck, it’s good to know whether you’ll land on a plush mattress or a concrete slab.</p>
<p>American Socialism as we see it today is not driven (or at least promoted and communicated) as much by an ideological purity to its European ancestors as it is by its own unique Yankee twist – something I would call “self-absorbed” socialism. It’s a socialism that is driven more by self-gratification and self-security than anything else. Unlike Bolshevism, which was driven into power during harsh and lean economic times in Russia, American socialism is driven by a sense of fulfillment – I want mine. It is rationalized into an entitlement – I deserve it. Don’t these phrases sound like typical commercial jingles and slogans heard ubiquitously on air?</p>
<p>When I heard the phrases a year ago about how “Obama will pay our mortgage” or “Obama will hand out cash”, it wasn’t for some noble cause of philosophical advancement. It was simply a case of “I want it, I need it, so give it.” Easy money from an unending supply, something the Boomers would have been accustomed to expecting. Thus they perpetuate the expectation.</p>
<p>The irony is that with the policies so favored among the receding hairline crowd of old 60’s flower kids now holding positions of power in DC, culture, and community, we could very well see the return of hardship to our country. Chief among these is a recognition that while the Builders endured great hardships on their way to a better future, the Boomers could see the squandering of their predecessors’ wealth from their own early years turned into an unforgiving winter of their final days as a generation.</p>
<p>Only this time, the character of the generation may not be ready to endure it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/04/can-the-boomers-do-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In their own words: Obama can’t govern and Biden doesn’t do anything</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/04/in-their-own-words-obama-can%e2%80%99t-govern-and-biden-doesn%e2%80%99t-do-anything/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/04/in-their-own-words-obama-can%e2%80%99t-govern-and-biden-doesn%e2%80%99t-do-anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Braithwaite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2007 Barack Obama said, “You gotta break out of what I call the sort of 50-plus-one pattern of presidential politics.  Maybe you eke out a victory with 50-plus-one but you can&#8217;t govern. You know, you get Air Force One and a lot of nice perks as president but you can&#8217;t &#8212; you can&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2007 <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_030310/content/01125112.guest.html">Barack Obama said</a>, “You gotta break out of what I call the sort of 50-plus-one pattern of presidential politics.  Maybe you eke out a victory with 50-plus-one but you can&#8217;t govern. You know, you get Air Force One and a lot of nice perks as president but you can&#8217;t &#8212; you can&#8217;t deliver on health &#8212; we&#8217;re not going to pass universal health care with a &#8212; with a 50-plus-one strategy.”</p>
<p>When <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703862704575099561273510680.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLETopStories">President Obama embraced</a> what he calls the, “fifty-plus-one pattern of presidential politics,” to pass a health care bill, he admitted that he “can’t govern.” </p>
<p>Last February, President Obama <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/23/obama-taps-biden-oversee-stimulus-package-implementation/">tapped Joe Biden</a> to oversee the $787 billion stimulus package saying, &#8220;The fact that I&#8217;m asking my vice president to personally lead this effort shows how important it is for our country and future to get this right,&#8221;<br />
<span id="more-4371"></span><br />
At last weeks health care summit, Joe Biden was <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/26/biden-how-wonderful-to-have-a-job-where-i-dont-do-anything/">overheard</a> telling a participant, “It’s easy being vice president – you don’t have to do anything.” </p>
<p>Now Americans knows why the $787 billion stimulus package isn’t working and the country is going to hell in a hand basket – the President can’t govern and the vice president forgot he had a job to do.</p>
<p>America is not in a position to have leaders that either can’t or don’t do their jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/04/in-their-own-words-obama-can%e2%80%99t-govern-and-biden-doesn%e2%80%99t-do-anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Bunning taps anti-government spending sentiment</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/02/sen-bunning-taps-anti-government-spending-sentiment/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/02/sen-bunning-taps-anti-government-spending-sentiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Braithwaite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the midst of this long and deep recession, Americans seem to be reaching a breaking point regarding government spending and the federal debt.
Having to tighten their own belts, many Americans support Senator Bunning for finally addressing something they have felt strongly about for years. 
While Democrats and the liberal media try to vilify Senator [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the midst of this long and deep recession, Americans seem to be reaching a breaking point regarding government spending and the federal debt.</p>
<p>Having to tighten their own belts, many Americans support <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/03/bunning_defends_his_position.html">Senator Bunning</a> for finally addressing something they have felt strongly about for years. </p>
<p>While Democrats and the liberal media try to vilify Senator Bunning for holding up legislation tied to an extension of unemployment benefits, Americans are starting to rally behind him. </p>
<p>Timing is everything, and Senator Bunning is betting this may be the perfect time to take a stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/02/sen-bunning-taps-anti-government-spending-sentiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama = Hypocrite</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/02/obama-hypocrite/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/02/obama-hypocrite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy La Mana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Right Scoop site this puts it all in a nice package
 Obama = Hypocrite 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From The Right Scoop site this puts it all in a nice package</p>
<div> <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKKs8hW8rF0&amp;feature=player_embedded'>Obama = Hypocrite</a> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/02/obama-hypocrite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Having tea in Brighton</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/01/having-tea-in-brighton/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/01/having-tea-in-brighton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red State Eddio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s contagious. Even the Brits, composed as they are known to be, have gotten a little exuberant about protesting their government spending issues. And believe me, if you thought we had it bad &#8211; wow, they&#8217;ve got it worse. Their debt is 12.6 of GDP; Greece is 12.7, and the Greek state is falling apart. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s contagious. Even the Brits, composed as they are known to be, have gotten a little exuberant about protesting their government spending issues. And believe me, if you thought we had it bad &#8211; wow, they&#8217;ve got it worse. Their debt is 12.6 of GDP; Greece is 12.7, and the Greek state is falling apart. That&#8217;s like hanging onto the outside of an airplane while it&#8217;s in the air &#8211; you&#8217;d better have a darn good grip, or you&#8217;re going down fast. </p>
<p>Revered conservative and PD hero Daniel Hannan decided to host an <strong>American style Tea Party</strong> protest with only 2 days notice &#8211; and <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100027834/brighton-tea-party-packed-out/">they packed the house</a>. They were expecting 50, and over 300+ showed up. It was wildly received. And they did serve the real stuff &#8211; a spot of tea, what?</p>
<p>Here he is being interviewed just ahead of the event on Friday.</p>
<p><object width="432" height="266"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IQ1gfCrddVs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IQ1gfCrddVs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="432" height="266"></embed></object></p>
<p>Me thinks pockets of common sense are starting to break out around the world. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/03/01/having-tea-in-brighton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeb Bush lambastes Charlie Crist</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/28/jeb-bush-lambastes-charlie-crist/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/28/jeb-bush-lambastes-charlie-crist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy La Mana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with Newsmax, Jeb Bush began the interview by saying he doesn’t know if he’ll endorse Marco Rubio or Charlie Crist for the US Senate, however, he didn’t pull any punches as he lambasted Crist for his support of Obama’s massive stimulus package.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an interview with Newsmax, Jeb Bush began the interview by saying he doesn’t know if he’ll endorse Marco Rubio or Charlie Crist for the US Senate, however, he didn’t pull any punches as he lambasted Crist for his support of Obama’s massive stimulus package.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOuDe-ASIvk&amp;feature=player_embedded"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/28/jeb-bush-lambastes-charlie-crist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pence vs Rendell on Fox and Friends</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/26/pence-vs-rendell-on-fox-and-friends/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/26/pence-vs-rendell-on-fox-and-friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Troy La Mana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race for White House 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Races 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The war between these two heats up.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The war between these two heats up.</p>
<p><object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ALjCZHyHKvo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ALjCZHyHKvo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/26/pence-vs-rendell-on-fox-and-friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exercise in futility</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/26/exercise-in-futility/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/26/exercise-in-futility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Braithwaite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The so-called bipartisan health care summit should leave no doubt that President Obama is not concerned with any input from Republicans. What the President is concerned with is moving health care legislation ahead &#8211; any way he can. 
While the President and Democrats parroted White House talking points and told numerous personal and anecdotal health [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The so-called bipartisan health care summit should leave no doubt that President Obama is not concerned with any input from Republicans. What the President is concerned with is moving health care legislation ahead &#8211; any way he can. </p>
<p>While the President and Democrats parroted White House talking points and told numerous personal and anecdotal health care stories, Republicans presented substantive policy ideas, quoted relative health care facts and figures, and addressed procedural concerns regarding favors given to elected officials and special interest groups.<br />
<span id="more-4324"></span><br />
Every substantive point made by Republican’s was followed by a direct rebuttal from the President, usually accompanied by a warning or scolding.  </p>
<p>The President’s rebuttals were always prefaced with, “You make a good point,” followed by specific White House talking points reiterating why any Republican “good points” would never be considered in any final health care bill.</p>
<p>President Obama made sure every Republican in the room understood that: the “election was over,” that he was President, that he could talk as much as he liked, and that the use of any material facts and props by Republicans was way out of line.</p>
<p>All in all, today’s meeting proved very informative to any objective observer. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, it also proved very useless is accomplishing anything regarding health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/26/exercise-in-futility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My answer &#8211; Vote Whig!</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/26/my-answer-vote-whig/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/26/my-answer-vote-whig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kaiser, Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Bring back the party of Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://despair.dgram.net/wailinglist/votewhigWL.jpg" alt=""  width="450" height="225"/></div>
<p>Bring back the party of Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/26/my-answer-vote-whig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The slow motion train wreck</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/25/the-slow-motion-train-wreck/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/25/the-slow-motion-train-wreck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cordeiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must confess I didn’t get a chance to watch much of the heralded “health care summit” today. When I did get to watch it, I was reminded of US Deputy Marshal Samuel Girard’s first reaction to the train wreck scene in The Fugitive:
My, my, my…what a mess!
The One summoned DC’s political heavy hitters to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must confess I didn’t get a chance to watch much of the heralded “health care summit” today. When I did get to watch it, I was reminded of US Deputy Marshal Samuel Girard’s first reaction to the train wreck scene in <em>The Fugitive</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>My, my, my…what a mess!</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The One summoned DC’s political heavy hitters to Blair House with the intention of hammering out some sort of compromise on the only signature campaign issue he has left – that of socializing the American medical system. Over the course of my professional career, I have been required to sit through more than my fair share of meetings. On occasion, I’ve had to conduct these meetings so I can reliably tell you running an effective meeting is not nearly as easy as it looks.<br />
<span id="more-4316"></span><br />
Today, The One made having drug free wisdom teeth extraction seem a welcome alternative to sitting through – let alone running – that sorry excuse for a meeting of the minds. I have never in all my years seen a more inept person attempt to run a meeting. It was (painfully) obvious The One is not accustomed to engaging in an exchange of ideas among equals. Whenever he asked a question of an opponent, and the opponent dared to attempt an answer, The One simply kept repeating his talking points until the opponent shut up. Dare to bring a copy of the bill in question to the table? Shame on you Mr. Cantor.</p>
<p>Yeah, Barry. This was really effective.</p>
<p>I don’t question the need to effectively reform this nation’s health care system. That said, I didn’t see any serious attempt by The One and his merry band of thugs to fix what ails the system. All I saw was what can only be defined as a bad joke on a second rate sitcom. Most of the exchanges I saw went something like this:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Un-named elected official: Oh great and wise Oracle of Obama-ness! Health care is so bad in my state…</p>
<p>The One: How bad is it?</p>
<p>Un-named elected official: Health care is so bad in my state that… (insert hyperbole here)</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I mean seriously, did listening to North Dakota’s own Kent Conrad whine about his father-in-law’s drug regime really advance the cause of American medicine? C’mon, Kent! Do you honestly believe a government bureaucracy would do a better job at sorting out an old man’s meds than would someone who actually cares about him?</p>
<p>Dear reader, this farce of a health care summit was far and away the worst government exercise I have ever seen or otherwise witnessed. I’ve seen congressional sub-committee hearings broadcast on CSPAN at three o’clock in the morning that were better organized and accomplished more substantive results than this meeting of our nation’s highest elected leaders.</p>
<p>So, tell me. Having watched any part of that meeting, are you in any way confident of the ability of any of those people in that room to reform this nation’s health care system in any way, shape, manner, or form? I sure as blazes am not. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/25/the-slow-motion-train-wreck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Arrogant&#8230;naked power grab&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/24/arrogant-naked-power-grab/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/24/arrogant-naked-power-grab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red State Eddio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Clips and Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest phrase to describe the Obama Admin and the Dem Congress? As a matter of fact, no. it&#8217;s the description of the Republican held Senate in 2005, when the Repub&#8217;s wanted to use the &#8220;nuclear option&#8221; on judicial nominees that the Dem&#8217;s were holding up &#8211; the same tactic the Dem&#8217;s want to use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest phrase to describe the Obama Admin and the Dem Congress? As a matter of fact, no. it&#8217;s the description of the <strong><em>Republican</em></strong> held Senate in 2005, when the Repub&#8217;s wanted to use the &#8220;nuclear option&#8221; on judicial nominees that the Dem&#8217;s were holding up &#8211; the same tactic the Dem&#8217;s want to use to pass health care (reconciliation).</p>
<p>A rather lengthy list of Democrats sounding extremely righteous in their criticism of it. </p>
<p><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/hJNRgcihYQI%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="432" height="328" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></p>
<p>Biden (a classic as always): &#8220;I pray God that we don&#8217;t we don&#8217;t make the kind of naked power grab you are doing.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, now that you do have the power, have you decided that it&#8217;s all of a sudden OK to try these &#8216;arrogant naked power grabs&#8217;? </p>
<p>Incredible display of hypocrisy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/24/arrogant-naked-power-grab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have you no shame, sir?</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/24/have-you-no-shame-sir/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/24/have-you-no-shame-sir/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Fountain, Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Clips and Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you live in Dallas and you&#8217;re free on February 27th at noon you have been invited to attend the Dallas Tea Party one year anniversary. Oh &#8211; and if your name is Keith Olbermann, you&#8217;ve been given a personal invitation.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you live in Dallas and you&#8217;re free on February 27th at noon you have been invited to attend the Dallas Tea Party one year anniversary. Oh &#8211; and if your name is Keith Olbermann, you&#8217;ve been given a personal invitation.</p>
<p><object width="432" height="266"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hMdPTpOyUk4&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hMdPTpOyUk4&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="432" height="266"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/24/have-you-no-shame-sir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One nation?</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/24/one-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/24/one-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>East of Eden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the Track]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting news item crossed my desk this AM.  Apparently the Congress is pushing a bill that would create a separate race-based government for native Hawaiians, similar to that of an Indian tribe.  Pres Obama has promised to sign the bill if it comes to him.
This troubles me on many levels.  First, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting news item crossed my desk this AM.  Apparently the Congress is pushing a bill that <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2010/02/23/a-separate-race-based-government-for-native-hawaiians/">would create a separate race-based government for native Hawaiians</a>, similar to that of an Indian tribe.  Pres Obama has promised to sign the bill if it comes to him.</p>
<p>This troubles me on many levels.  First, doing anything “based on race” is racist. The only way we’re going to get past racial issues in this country is to stop obsessing about them.   I was sure Obama was supposed to be post racial or something, but it seems he and his people like to push the race card all the time.  Second, living where I do in Northern New Mexico, surrounded by no less than 5 different Native Nations, and having taught on “The Rez” I have seen firsthand the failure of tribal governments and the Federal government where their people and tax monies are concerned. <span id="more-4283"></span> Third, how does this bring people together?  It doesn’t.  This will undermine state and local governments in Hawaii and add a new layer of government and corruption to an already over govererned nation and will pit Anglo against Hawaiian.  Finally, it sets a dangerous precedent.  What group will want their own nation next?  I’m of English, Scottish, German, and Danish descent.  If we get enough of those people together can we get our own nation too?</p>
<p>If I remember correctly the refrain states, “One nation, under God, with Liberty and Justice for all”.  Creating a separate government for native Hawaiians certainly will not further this end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/24/one-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah-pean license plates?</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/23/utah-pean-license-plates/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/23/utah-pean-license-plates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kaiser, Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the lighter side of politics, one gubernatorial candidate in Utah, Richard Martin, took time in the list of his stands on various issues to pass along this interesting tidbit that is sure to rattle the cages:
Some issues don’t seem that important, but they can make our lives a bit more enjoyable. For example:
License plates: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the lighter side of politics, one gubernatorial candidate in Utah, Richard Martin, took time in the<a href="http://www.richardmartingovernor.com/interview.html"> list of his stands on various issues</a> to pass along this interesting tidbit that is sure to rattle the cages:</p>
<blockquote><p>Some issues don’t seem that important, but they can make our lives a bit more enjoyable. For example:<br />
License plates: The state can provide European style plates for those willing to pay for them. They look great on some vehicles that have the space, and make some cars look better.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-4281"></span><br />
Now I personally am against said license plates because these imports will surely take the jobs of hundreds of American inmates, who will have to go on the prison unemployment dole and become even more of a burden to the state then they already are.</p>
<p>But they certainly are stylish, aren&#8217;t they? And this one even has my initials!</p>
<div><img src="http://www.richardmartingovernor.com/images/licensePlate.jpg" alt=""  width="450" height="106"/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/23/utah-pean-license-plates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans, it&#8217;s wake up time</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/23/republicans-its-wake-up-time/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/23/republicans-its-wake-up-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red State Eddio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, a disclaimer: I did not go to CPAC, didn&#8217;t watch any of the speeches, noticed only a few headlines about it, and of course, I am not a Ron Paul fan.
Instead, I thought I&#8217;d write a fresh post on the issue of the main message coming from CPAC last weekend. As we&#8217;ve all been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, a disclaimer: I did not go to CPAC, didn&#8217;t watch any of the speeches, noticed only a few headlines about it, and of course, I am not a Ron Paul fan.</p>
<p>Instead, I thought I&#8217;d write a fresh post on the issue of the main message coming from CPAC last weekend. As we&#8217;ve all been made aware, Ron Paul stole&#8230;er, rigged&#8230;I mean, won the straw poll released on Sunday (that was for all the conspiracy theorists among us).</p>
<p><span id="more-4268"></span></p>
<p>Whether or not Ron Paul is the man to lead the masses is beside the point. The message is loud and clear: fiscal restraint and responsibility need to be the leading edge, the rallying cry, and the media message this fall. Smaller government, fiscal discipline, and individual liberties all lie at the heart of what Paul has championed over the years. Regardless of whether we think Ron Paul is a crazy old coot, or a long-lost wandering extra from “One Flew Over the Cuckoo&#8217;s Nest”, his message is sinking in with a growing percentage of people. Maybe CPAC was a tipping point.</p>
<p>Even if we take out half of his “supporters”, Ron Paul still ends up at 15%. He finishes second. <em>Second.</em> We all knew Mitt would pull numbers; but for Paul to get that many, and for the rest of the pack to poll so low, illustrates the point. The people want action; they want something done. Enough of the personality games and Fox News show hosts; we need real action in real time. There&#8217;s too much at stake, and not much time left, especially as the Communist-in-Chief keeps transforming us into a &#8220;Workers&#8217; Paradise&#8221; more and more each day.</p>
<p>If we don’t secure the purse strings soon, there will be no treasury left. We will become vassals of the Chinese. They may even start calling us “Taiwan East”. Our military will not only be unable to sustain their campaigns; they may even need to go through massive reductions in force and strength, thus rendering our own country vulnerable, or neutering us as our interests around the world are violated and taken away.</p>
<p>Republicans, ignore the message at your own peril.</p>
<p>To be fair, there are some who already get it. Mike Pence gets it. Paul Ryan, whose <a href="http://www.roadmap.republicans.budget.house.gov/">Roadmap for America</a> is the most appealing thing out there right now, gets it. Demint and Coburn get it. My own HR Rep Platts gets it. But the fact that I can name individuals should tell you how dispiriting it is that I can’t just lump all the Repubs together and say that they all get it. </p>
<p>Republicans, if you don’t hear this message and embrace it like you’re squeezing the life out of Angelina Jolie, two things willl happen:</p>
<p>1 – there will come a third party split, one that will definitely affect you more negatively than any of the moderate or conservative Dems still possibly remaining in the Dem party. This will lead to…</p>
<p>2 &#8211; Obama dumping a crap load of his nation-destroying agenda on us for 6 more years, with the consequences reverberating for a decade, if not a generation. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s morning in America, Republicans. The six AM alarm is going off. You gonna get it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/23/republicans-its-wake-up-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What can Brown do for you?</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/22/what-can-brown-do-for-you-2/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/22/what-can-brown-do-for-you-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Braithwaite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Brown votes with Democrats for jobs bill.
Didn’t those Democrats learn anything from that Massachusetts election? 
Oh that’s right – that was his election.  
Serve up another liberal tax and spend RINO.
Snow and Collins should feel more comfortable now.
Nice looking guy though – and a great politician!
What do you want to bet he votes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Senator Brown votes with Democrats for <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2221899520100222">jobs bill</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Didn’t those Democrats learn anything from that Massachusetts election? </p>
<p>Oh that’s right – that was his election.  </p>
<p>Serve up another liberal tax and spend RINO.</p>
<p>Snow and Collins should feel more comfortable now.</p>
<p>Nice looking guy though – and a great politician!</p>
<p><strong>What do you want to bet he votes for Obama&#8217;s health bill compromise?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/22/what-can-brown-do-for-you-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indoctrination in our schools</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/22/indoctrination-in-our-schools/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/22/indoctrination-in-our-schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott A. Robinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading an article about someone who listed as one of their primary influences in life Walt Disney. My eight-year-old daughter happened to be reading the article over my shoulder and asked what it meant for someone to be an influence. After I explained it she told me Walt Disney was a bad man. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading an article about someone who listed as one of their primary influences in life Walt Disney. My eight-year-old daughter happened to be reading the article over my shoulder and asked what it meant for someone to be an influence. After I explained it she told me Walt Disney was a bad man. You should have seen the look on on my face. My eight year old daughter just said Walt Disney was a bad man!!! This is the same girl who loves Disney princess everything, who would watch three Disney movies every day if we would let her, and whose dream vacation is (or was) Disney World.</p>
<p><span id="more-4252"></span></p>
<p>So naturally I asked her why Walt Disney was a bad man. She told me he cut down trees and covered water in swamps to build Disney World and this made him a bad man. I asked her who told her this. She responded, &#8220;My teacher&#8221;. I was then and two days later am still disgusted, frustrated, and extremely annoyed by this. School is not for indoctrinating our children with someone&#8217;s social values. It is for teaching math, science, true history, and language.</p>
<p>Now we are reaching the apex one well-laid plan (of many) from the 1930s. As evidence, read this plaque I look a picture of in the Smithsonian American History museum when I was in <a href="http://scottslant.blogspot.com/2009/09/standing-for-our-republic-on-91209.html">Washington DC on 9/12/2009</a> with around 1,000,000 of my closest friends:</p>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_oDO8iuQ3er0/S4JyFlBkBFI/AAAAAAAAAmI/oKl01XOgCIc/s1600-h/Progressives+in+Schools.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px;text-align: center;cursor: pointer;width: 400px;height: 267px" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_oDO8iuQ3er0/S4JyFlBkBFI/AAAAAAAAAmI/oKl01XOgCIc/s400/Progressives+in+Schools.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="400" /></a><br />
&#8220;Progressive educators&#8221; desired a &#8220;more standardized education&#8221;. This way they could indoctrinate the rising generations (oh the history I&#8217;ve had to relearn!) and now I have to constantly quiz my daughter on what she was taught due to the need to reteach her! She is taught so many fallacies, such as FDR being the greatest President of all time and that we should never drive our cars. Apparently her teacher missed all the parts where FDR attempted to unravel the constitution (and in many ways did) and how transportation allows us to grow the economy by doing important things such as work, not to mention taking the children to school for more of this indoctrination! When children in school are taught <a href="http://scottslant.blogspot.com/2009/09/indoctrination-in-our-schools.html">this kind of drivel</a> it is no wonder each new generation is more confused, lost, and lacking moral grounding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/22/indoctrination-in-our-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul wins CPAC straw poll</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/20/ron-paul-wins-cpac-straw-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/20/ron-paul-wins-cpac-straw-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Wright, Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul was first, Romney second, Palin a distant third.
Amazing that in our poll prediction contest (with poor participation by the way, you slackers) not a single entry predicted the Ron Paul victory.
Why did Ron Paul, a guy who has never and will never have a chance of actually being elected, win this thing?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/20/ron-paul-wins-presidential-straw-poll-cpac/">Paul was first, Romney second, Palin a distant third.</a></p>
<p>Amazing that in our <a href="http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/18/predict-cpac-straw-poll-win-a-free-book/#comments">poll prediction contest</a> (with poor participation by the way, you slackers) not a single entry predicted the Ron Paul victory.</p>
<p>Why did Ron Paul, a guy who has never and will never have a chance of actually being elected, win this thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/20/ron-paul-wins-cpac-straw-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the CPAC Blogger of the Year is…</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/20/and-the-cpac-blogger-of-the-year-is%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/20/and-the-cpac-blogger-of-the-year-is%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cordeiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outside the Track]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Drumroll]
Not me. Yes. I am crushed. I would demand a recount, but considering the guy who actually walked away with the prize I will put aside any questions about the actual vote counting.
All kidding aside, I humbly tip my hat to a HotAir’s “Captain” Ed Morrissey, formerly of CaptainsQuarters. He’s done yeoman’s work for years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Drumroll]</p>
<p>Not me. Yes. I am crushed. I would demand a recount, but considering the guy who actually walked away with the prize I will put aside any questions about the actual vote counting.</p>
<p>All kidding aside, I humbly tip my hat to a HotAir’s “Captain” Ed Morrissey, formerly of CaptainsQuarters. He’s done yeoman’s work for years and this award is well deserved if not overdue. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWCwEs1DszI&amp;feature=player_embedded">Being introduced and lauded by Rush Limbaugh</a> more than made up for the delay.<br />
<span id="more-4237"></span><br />
I had the honor of meeting Ed a few CPACs ago. Having met the man, I can categorically deny the swirling rumors that he is a closet pinko commie. Those are lies. Damn lies! There is no truth to them what so ever!</p>
<div><img src="http://politicalderby.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/captain-ed-208x300.jpg" alt="captain ed" width="208" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4238" /></div>
<p>Congrats, Ed. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/20/and-the-cpac-blogger-of-the-year-is%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And some people think Pawlenty is the 2012 frontrunner?</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/19/and-some-people-think-pawlenty-is-the-2012-frontrunner/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/19/and-some-people-think-pawlenty-is-the-2012-frontrunner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Wright, Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? I hope this isn&#8217;t the best he&#8217;s got. I was actually a little embarrassed for him watching this &#8220;red meat&#8221; line. Yikes.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? I hope this isn&#8217;t the best he&#8217;s got. I was actually a little embarrassed for him watching this &#8220;red meat&#8221; line. Yikes.</p>
<p><object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZVkwXDEPMUs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZVkwXDEPMUs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/19/and-some-people-think-pawlenty-is-the-2012-frontrunner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tone deaf and out of tune</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/19/tone-deaf-and-out-of-tune/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/19/tone-deaf-and-out-of-tune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Red State Eddio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here it is, as plain as day. Talk about absolutely, positively, without-a-doubt, no more questioning needed &#8211; he does not get it.
It&#8217;s not just his handlers and staff; it&#8217;s him.

In a politico post, describing a recent meeting he and other congressional leaders had at the White House, Ohio Republican Rep John Boehner said President Obama [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is, as plain as day. Talk about absolutely, positively, without-a-doubt, no more questioning needed &#8211; he does not get it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just his handlers and staff; it&#8217;s him.</p>
<p><span id="more-4221"></span></p>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33152.html#ixzz0fwt0j3rq">politico post</a>, describing a recent meeting he and other congressional leaders had at the White House, Ohio Republican Rep John Boehner said President Obama “looked at me and slapped the table and said, ‘Boehner, it’s not my policies that are polarizing the American people; it’s you Republicans scaring them.’”</p>
<p>Boehner then said he responded: “No, it’s your policies.”</p>
<p>Wow, the amazing power of an out-of-power minority party that has no bargaining chips nor ability to derail the &#8220;train of transformational politics&#8221;. It&#8217;s not the fractious shards of democratic alliances with labor thugs, other special interests, and members of their own party; it&#8217;s not the staffing of communists and other liberal fringe throughout the WH; it&#8217;s not running up debt faster than Paris Hilton on a shopping bender, all payable by the rest of the country. </p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s those tiny clusters of Republicans, shut out of most major media markets and forums by biased commentators, able to somehow conjure up a tidal wave of momentum on all these issues combined. </p>
<p>Wow, if the R&#8217;s can do all this while in the political wilderness, can you imagine what they could influence and command if ever able to regain actual power?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/19/tone-deaf-and-out-of-tune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporting from CPAC: Day 1</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/19/reporting-from-cpac-day-1/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/19/reporting-from-cpac-day-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alaina Segovia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Races 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend the American Conservative Union (ACU) is hosting CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) DC. As a political junkie, I feel like I have died and gone to Heaven.

Marco Rubio kicked off the conference this morning with an inspiring speech that brought the room to tears as he reminded us why America is the greatest country [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend the American Conservative Union (ACU) is hosting CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) DC. As a political junkie, I feel like I have died and gone to Heaven.</p>
<p><span id="more-4222"></span></p>
<p>Marco Rubio kicked off the conference this morning with an inspiring speech that brought the room to tears as he reminded us why America is the greatest country in the world and what it means to be an American. He is truly a rising star in the GOP. Look for a run for the Presidency in 2016 or 2020. Assuming he doesn&#8217;t pull a Mark Sanford or make some other unforgiveable, bonehead move, he will be the future of the Republican Party.</p>
<p>Jim DeMint was not as exciting as Rubio, but discussed the problem with Washington&#8217;s spending spree. He spoke of a bill that he created last week to put a one year moratorium on earmark spending in Congress.  If you&#8217;d like to read more and see which Senator&#8217;s have co-sponsored the bills and which haven&#8217;t, go to his website at senateconservatives.com.</p>
<p>Dick Armey was forgettable and Liz Cheney was predictable, until she introduced her father as a surprise guest speaker. Dick Cheney continued to rattle liberal cages when he announced that Obama would be a one term President. Say what you will about the man, but he knows how to keep this country safe and forces the Obama Administration to defend their decisions on the treatment of terrorists. For that, I will forever be grateful.</p>
<p>Scott Brown was the next surprise guest and brought the house down. The energy in the room was like nothing I&#8217;ve ever felt, but he didn&#8217;t speak long before introducing Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>Romney was the disappointment of the day.  He spent an entire half hour bashing Obama and all of 30 seconds discussing very high level solutions to the problems this administration is creating.  My advice to Romney: Know your audience.  There wasn&#8217;t a single person in that room that needed to be sold on conservative values and a lesson on why Obama&#8217;s policies are detrimental to our country, with the obvious exception of members of the liberal elite media that were being paid to be there.  As a potential presidential candidate, he should have provided specific actions that he would take now or 2012 if he were President.</p>
<p>By contrast, John Boehner was excellent. His began his speech by discussing his accomplishments this year as the House Minority Leader and discussed 3 lessons that he learned while serving in the House: Have the willingness and ability to listen, good things will happen if you do good things and always work harder than your opponents. To close, he provided 7 specific, measurable actions that he would implement if he becomes Speaker of the House in 2010.  That is exactly the kind of speech that Republicans should be giving going into the 2010 elections.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re at CPAC this weekend and would like to meet for a cup of coffee or listen to one of the speeches together, please feel free to email me at <a href="mailto:alaina.segovia@gmail.com">alaina.segovia@gmail.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/19/reporting-from-cpac-day-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predict CPAC straw poll, win a free book</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/18/predict-cpac-straw-poll-win-a-free-book/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/18/predict-cpac-straw-poll-win-a-free-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Wright, Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race for White House 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/?p=4217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now everyone knows CPAC is well underway. Between now and Saturday, attendees will have a chance to vote in the most important 2012 poll of any kind to-date. Who will win?

Predict the top three finishers and their percentages in the post comments. Closest to actual results will win a signed advance copy of The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now everyone knows <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/18/conservatives.meeting/index.html">CPAC is well underway</a>. Between now and Saturday, attendees will have a chance to vote in the most important 2012 poll of any kind to-date. Who will win?</p>
<p><span id="more-4217"></span></p>
<p>Predict the <strong>top three finishers</strong> and their percentages in the post comments. Closest to actual results will win a signed advance copy of <em><a href="http://www.jasonfwright.com/thecrossgardener.html">The Cross Gardener</a></em> a week before it goes on sale.</p>
<p>Here are the contenders as they appear on the CPAC ballot:</p>
<p>Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour<br />
Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels<br />
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich<br />
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee<br />
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin<br />
Texas Rep. Ron Paul<br />
Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty<br />
Indiana Rep. Mike Pence<br />
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney<br />
Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum<br />
South Dakota Sen. John Thune<br />
Other</p>
<p><strong>SPECIAL BONUS CONTEST:</strong></p>
<p>Predict the <em>exact</em> order of <em>all</em> 11 contenders (no percentages necessary) and I&#8217;ll let you pick any three books from my collection. Please post this prediction in a separate comment from your &#8220;top 3&#8243; prediction.</p>
<p>Both contests close Saturday at 8:00 AM, EST.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalderby.com/2010/02/18/predict-cpac-straw-poll-win-a-free-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
