http://politicalderby.com/2009/06/08/scotus-puts-the-breaks-on-chrysler-deal/ Latest National PD Composite: Romney 41.9% - Gingrich 24.5% - Santorum 21.0% - Paul 12.6% Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:10:00 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 http://politicalderby.com/2009/06/08/scotus-puts-the-breaks-on-chrysler-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-212749 Alaina Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:10:44 +0000 http://politicalderby.com/2009/06/08/scotus-puts-the-breaks-on-chrysler-deal/#comment-212749 So do they have to approve the GM deal? If so, how was this squashed and GM not? So do they have to approve the GM deal? If so, how was this squashed and GM not?

]]> http://politicalderby.com/2009/06/08/scotus-puts-the-breaks-on-chrysler-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-212692 Troy La Mana Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:43:02 +0000 http://politicalderby.com/2009/06/08/scotus-puts-the-breaks-on-chrysler-deal/#comment-212692 You don't get it. She put the kabosh on this deal because it didn't pay off the UAW enough. You don’t get it. She put the kabosh on this deal because it didn’t pay off the UAW enough.

]]> http://politicalderby.com/2009/06/08/scotus-puts-the-breaks-on-chrysler-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-212655 Scott A. Robinson Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:28:47 +0000 http://politicalderby.com/2009/06/08/scotus-puts-the-breaks-on-chrysler-deal/#comment-212655 Wait a minute. The Supreme Court is supposed to hold up the constitution? You mean valid contracts, like the ones the secure debt holders had, have to actually be honored rather than paying off the UAW for its support? No. That can't possibly be true. Wait a minute. The Supreme Court is supposed to hold up the constitution? You mean valid contracts, like the ones the secure debt holders had, have to actually be honored rather than paying off the UAW for its support? No. That can’t possibly be true.

]]>