Not surprisingly, the NY Times deems Palin’s wardrobe expenses more important than a case against Barack Obama’s citizenship. Forking over a viable birth certificate to prove eligibility for the most powerful job in the world is trumped by a V.P. candidate’s designer clothes and stylists. Sarah’s apparel makes front page news; Obama’s lawsuit requires a search engine to even find an Op Ed piece on the matter.

The Times are not alone in their efforts to assist Obama in a Nov 4th victory. No major news networks are picking up the story. Even my semi-conservative local paper neglected to report on yesterday’s rulings; but on page three I saw useless information regarding Sarah’s personal stylist making more than some of McCain’s staff.

Philip Berg, former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, filed a suit against The Anointed One claiming that Barrack Hussein (Oops! Used the middle name!) Obama is in fact NOT a natural-born citizen of the United States. Last time I checked, that was one of the three basic requirements to be POTUS. Apparently the ducks aren’t all in a row regarding Obama’s actual birthplace–Hawaii or Kenya–and how his alleged citizenship was actually given up anyway by taking up residency in Indonesia in 1967. Just a small piece of information, really, which could be cleared up with one piece of paper. So why no response from Obama or his lawyers to meet a federally-mandated deadline?

October Surprise was recently produced by an Independent film company……outlining Berg’s case against the DNC’s golden child.

I can already detect the questions/defenses the liberals are drumming up:

1. He posted his birth certificate on-line. Yeah, well, it’s not an actual birth certificate; it’s a certification of live birth…..not the same. Sure, they share the same info, but the latter includes less.

2. Yes, but factcheck.org also has his certificate on-line. The one on factcheck has a seal; Obama’s site does not. And really, factcheck? Isn’t there a conflict of interest when this site is owned by Annenburg of Chicago……the same group where Obama served as a board member? Three independent document forensic experts have already identified the certificate as forged. Plus, this posted document omits key information that normally appears on birth certificates in the U.S.: name of hospital, size and weight, even the doctor. And then there’s that part that identifies the race of the father. It’s described as “African”…..a term that would not have been used in 1961.

3. The local Hawaii paper announced his birth. They announced his birth, not his birthplace. Most people want to announce the birth of their child in their local newspaper, whether they are born there or not. This holds no validity.

4. Isn’t this the same guy with that conspiracy theory about Bush and Cheney blowing up the twin towers? Yes, yes it is. He’s also a life-long democrat. Not one comrade has called him up to ask him to drop the case. And if this were completely ludicrous, why hasn’t Obama’s legal team filed a counter lawsuit? Hmmm, what are they hiding……

5. This is some loon trying to attract attention. Seven other states have also filed similar lawsuits. Berg’s goal in this time-consuming effort is to uphold the Constitution.

6. What if Obama lost his birth certificate? Considering that one could easily obtain a duplicate within days, or Obama’s case probably hours, this carries no weight. But see, I doubt a lost document is the case. According to his own 1995 memoir, “Dreams of My Father,” he states “I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school.” If this precious document was so important to him then, why would he have lost it…….and why is he so afraid to show it?

Now, before the lurkers and liberals foam at the mouth and commence hurling verbal assaults, just answer me one question: Why can’t your candidate produce a simple document? This whole fiasco would be put to rest by one simple task. Prove Mr. Berg wrong. Make him look like an idiot.

The fact of the matter is, there is more to Mr. Obama than meets the eye. The secretive nature of this man and his continual down-play of various associations are frightening. Obama continually refuses to release documentation of birth and records from any of the universities he attended (could it be because those records contain info regarding said crucial info?)

And one more question: Why on earth would Barrack leave his campaign at such a critical time to fly to Hawaii to visit his ‘ailing’ grandmother? And if said grandmother is so gravely ill, why did he leave his wife and daughters at home?

Unfortunately, Judge R. Barclay Surrick dismissed the case yesterday on grounds that Berg has no standing to question the eligibility of the office of the president. So, if he holds no standing, you or I hold no standing……who does? According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.

Now, whenever I apply for employment it seems I am required to hand over everything save my first-born. Background checks are a must with my current job. Shouldn’t the same be expected of our presidential candidates?

The suits in the seven states are still alive. Let’s hope the states’ secretary of state can require Obama to prove he meets one of the fundamental requirements outlined by our Constitution to hold the highest office in the land.

In the meantime, Mr Berg is appealing to the Supreme Court. And as soon as he obtains affidavits to release the very words from Obama’s paternal grandmother claiming that she was in fact there at her grandson’s birth in Kenya, the crap will hit the fan. (But you won’t hear about it on MSNBC.)

Comments