A really bad Disney movie

By E.J. Keene

Filed Under General on Sep 11 

Matt Damon, Mr Bourne Identity/Ultimatum/Show-Down/Brouhaha, has decided to share a few concerns about Governor Palin. In case you were not aware, he’s a Hollywood heavy on the liberal political scene. I predict we will see his name on some significant national election someday. But for now, we have to listen to this.

Here’s a tip – listen to what he says, then insert the word “Obama” every time you hear the word “Palin” and see if he’s discovering what we conservatives have been saying for the last 6+ months.

Comments

  • JE

    And at what point are people going to tell us why we should vote FOR one of these people and not why we should vote AGAINST the other party???

  • JE

    Really, really small town.
    Folksy stuff at the hockey rink.
    Dinosaurs 4000 years ago.
    I am loving this stuff!
    Yes, Matt, these things are frightening! Almost as frightening as someone pretending to be someone else for a living talking on national television about world politics and people taking them serious!
    Next thing you know we will nominate and try to elect someone that has no record and won’t tell you any details about what they believe or want to do and run purely on platitudes such as hope and change!
    The more they blast Palin as some ignorant hick the more the backlash will be. Contrary to what most of hollywood, obama and their ilk think, this country has alot more people that believe in God, believe the founders meant the 2nd amendment and live/come from small towns than the people who fear them.
    Keep it coming!
    I’m not a big fan of any of the people running…but when hollywood tells me to be afraid of someone it means they are probably alot like me.

    • German Observer

      So why are you seeking for people that are like you? I always vote for peole, who are smarter than me. I don’t care if the candidates support my favorite soccer club, share my experiences and prfer the same dishes. What I want is somebody, who knows more and better than me. That’s all that matters.

      • JE

        As i said, i don’t particularly care for any of them…i just don’t like being attacked by people who have no idea about most of us except “you like guns and believe in God, you must be a nutcase”

      • Gary Russell

        Uh … I don’t mean to be too offensive with this, but … didn’t y’all have a little bit of trouble when you elected a guy a few years (say, 70 or so) ago who supposedly was smarter and “knew better”?
        How did that turn out for y’all?

        • German Observer

          Gary, you are not offensive at all. Your remark is just legitimate. And the trouble we had (and flooded to the world) was not “a little bit”, as you stated, it was a real mess. No words for it – and still I’m grateful to the American people for their contribution and sacrifice to overcome those dictators.
          But times have changed a bit. One thing to mention certainly is the media coverage. Candidates are deeply scrutinized by critical media and have to lay out their plans. An interview were an candidate for a higher office would reveal that he/she has no plan at all, about, say the foreign policy doctrin of the past years would be definitly the end of the campaign.
          System works quite well – and we learned a lot from history. At least in the past 60 years we didn’t have any real bonehad in office. I certainly did not like all of them, but after all they all were reasonable, responsible, truly democratic guys.

          To JE: never mind, I just concluded by your remark, that people who are critizized by hollywood celebreties are probably alot like you.

          • Gary Russell

            We’ve done fairly well with our elections, too.

            Elected a guy who saved the world from communism (Reagan), and a guy who has kept us from a second terrorist attack for over seven years now (Bush).

            I guess our only true “bonehead” was Carter, but we corrected that as quickly as possible.

            Your comment about media – “deeply scrutinized by critical media” – this is Obama’s big problem right now. He is not even remotely qualified to lead our country, but our media fell in love with him after one speech, and gave him a free ride during the primaries. THEY are the reason that the Democrat party is stuck with him instead of Hillary.

            Your comment about “no plan for foreign policy” – seemed to be directed at McCain/Palin, but they have a definite plan to stand up for American interests. That’s why many in the world (like Putin) would rather see Obama elected.

            • Red State Eddio

              I’d add Nixon to the “bonehead” list. While a hawk on nat’l security, he was a big spender on domestic issues. And was a raging paranoid which led to u-know-what…

              Since FDR:
              Truman – OK to GOOD
              Eisenhower – GOOD
              Kennedy – GOOD (yes, I’ll even say Dems can be good)
              LBJ – Mr. Welfare State
              Ford – OK for just a brief spell
              Carter – Disaster
              Reagan – Awesome
              Bush 41 – pretty good
              Clinton – good fiscally and bad socially all at the same time
              Bush 43 – OK, but didn’t tackle some important issues

            • German Observer

              Gary, my bonehad-comment was directed to Hitler in the first place, though bonehad for sure is a belittlement.

              Gary, seems that we disagree on almost every issue. But that’s fine, life would be boring otherwise. We also disagree in the judgement of Obama. I am not really a fan, but look at him with some sceptizism. Anyway I have the impression, that he would make a good president. See it as a hint, that he could come to Berlin and tell us some very uncomfortable truths in a very friendly manner, and was respected for this. The attitude is right and an Obama-presidency would restore a lot of acceptence in the world.
              Yes, sure, my comment was directed to Palin. Maybe McCain has a foreign policy plan, whether I would like it or not. Palin has definetly not, which was so obviously visible in that interview. Come on, Gary, you and I would be more qualified. You and I would not give Israel a freeride to do what ever they want, we would speak more reluctant about offering Georgia a Nato-membership (which de facto is not possible by the Nato-contract), we would be much more reluctant to speak about a war with Russia and definetly we heard about the Bush doctrin before and have an oppinion about it (probably a different one :-) ). What else would she have to say, that you would admit she isn’t ready?

              • Gary Russell

                Hey G.O.

                I’m sure that we don’t disagree on everything! You guys gave us Bach, Beethoven, & Mozart (I guess he was considered German/Austrian?), and some great cars.

                Politically speaking, though…
                Actually, NO, I don’t think that you or I would be more qualified. Can’t say that either of us has been the governor of a state, or even the mayor of a town.

                Can’t say that either of us can speak as elequently under intense pressure about ANY issue to a person whose sole goal is to trip us up, as Gov. Palin.

                And, actually, I definitely agree with Gov. Palin on the points that you mentioned.

                Israel: She didn’t offer them a “free ride”, but she sure makes it clear that they are our friend and have our support.

                Georgia: I absolutely support their membership into NATO, if possible (which I believe it is).

                Russia: If you were a Russia had invaded Germany, would you feel a little more different about her comments?

                Bush Doctrine: She isn’t ignorant. “Bush Doctrine” is a widely used term, with more than one meaning or context. She asked the interviewer for clarification as to HIS meaning, and he refused to clarify what he meant by “Bush Doctrine”. Obvious bias – vague question, needed clarification, but he tried to pretend that it was clear as a bell. What a weiner he was!

                • German Observer

                  Gary of course I speak about politics. I think on a personal level we would find a great lot of things we have in common.

                  Anyway your sight to Palin’s interview requires a few responses.

                  To that Israel-issue: Israel may be your friend and ally and certainly its okay to express the Americans support. But the question was how she would react if Israel attacked Iran, which for sure is playing with fire and could cause a war with unpredictable consequences. Even the Bush-administration takes action to pretend Israel friom doing so. But Palins instant answer was “there is no second-guess on Israel’s decisions”, three or four times in the same wording. That goes far beyond the justified support, I call it a free ride.

                  To Georgia and Russia: as far as I know the Nato-contract excludes to join members whose frontiers are not undisputable clarified. This is not the case actually. Beyond that formal matter I would be pretty reluctant to offer them the membership. That for two reasons. First it would be pretty provocative to the Russians to have a Nato-member next door. Imagine say Mexico or Canada would have joined the Warshaw-pact in that times. You would have felt quite uncomfortable I guess. Second reason is, that the current gouvernment of Georgia obviously is not a very reliable and serious partner. Of course Saakaschwili provoked the Russians and played with the fire when attacking the Russian population in South-Ossetia. What Palin actually called “unprovoked” was indeed a provocation. Nobody doubts anymore that Georgia started the war. That Russia “liked” to be provoked and reacted with disproportional measures is out of discussion. But anyway to deal with Russia is a thing you should do with great caution. So I liked what McCain said at his acceptence speech. He first praised Russia, called them friends, clarified not to intend a new cold war. And only after that expressed his symapthy to Georgia. Not so Palin. Her answer to the question if she was aware that a Georgia-membership would eventually mean a war with Russia was a simple “probably so”. That was the response of an intern. Change the sides for a second and imagine how you would receive this answer beeing Medwedev or Putin. Speaking so unreluctantly and naive about a war with one of your most important partners is certainly not a sign that she is ready. Every experienced politician had answered something like “Hey the Russians are our friends and I don’t want to participate in speculations what would happen in cases which are not even on the table”.

                  Finally the Bush-doctrin thing. Gary, with all personal respect, you can’t discuss away that she did not know what she was talking about. When asked about the most important ideological basis of the American foreign policy of the past five years she clearly had no clue what he was talking about and tried to save the situation by asking in what respect the question was meant. But the interviewer refused to give her a hint and asked for HER interpretation. No vague question, a fair opportunity to lay down her views. But she had none. So she tried a guess by unassertively asking “his world view?”. There may be more than one interpretation of the term but Bushs’ world view certainly doesn’t belong to them. Then, after the interviewer helped her with HIS interpretation, she displayed that she didn’t get the core. Her answer refered to the right to defend America, if there is clear indication that an imminent strike is threatening. How trivial! Of course you have! The question is, if you have the right of preemptive strikes, the right to intervene even before a threat has become imminent. You might favor this idea or oppose it, but at least you should have an oppinion about it, when you aspire to be the person in handsreach of the red button, ain’t you? Gary, honestly, this had nothing to do with liberal media, biased media, weiners or whatever. What else do you need? That she openly says, “hey interviewer, my team did not give me a lesson about it to memorize, please ask again next week”?

                  Enjoy your sunday!

                  P.S.: Sorry that my posts are always pretty long. As English is not my mother tongue I don’t really know how to form short sentences.

                  • Gary Russell

                    Hey G.O.
                    No need to apologize for your English. I’m very impressed. I myself am not fluent in a second language. I love your use of our “Southern English” word “ain’t”!

                    My comments about Charlie Gibson’s need to clarify his “Bush Doctrine” question, and Gov. Palin’s request for him to clarify, come from the following article:

                    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/charlie_gibsons_gaffe.html

  • Gary Russell

    C’mon, now.
    Everyone’s entitled to their (half-baked, naive, self-serving, shallow, self-important) opinion.

    btw…I hope Disney sues for slander.

  • Eric

    Folksy stuff at the Hockey rink?!
    Hockey players are probably more equipped to deal with Putin than most statesmen; and way more than average politicians.

    Bad Disney movie?! Still better than any movie he’s done. (Sorry, “Bourne” Fans. Not sorry, “Ocean’s” fans.)

  • Brian H (B-KOOKY)

    The Bourne Idiot