<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The dream is over for Stephen Colbert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/</link>
	<description>Latest National PD Composite: Romney 41.9%  -  Gingrich 24.5%  -  Santorum  21.0%  -  Paul 12.6%</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:10:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/comment-page-1/#comment-9117</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/#comment-9117</guid>
		<description>thank goodness.  the GOP&#039;s pretend candidates have already made enough of the mockery of the process</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank goodness.  the GOP&#8217;s pretend candidates have already made enough of the mockery of the process</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Boivie</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/comment-page-1/#comment-9115</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Boivie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/#comment-9115</guid>
		<description>Colbert announced the sad news on his show.  I&#039;m surprised he didn&#039;t immediately begin a write-in campaign, which I am officially suggesting right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colbert announced the sad news on his show.  I&#8217;m surprised he didn&#8217;t immediately begin a write-in campaign, which I am officially suggesting right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndDru1</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/comment-page-1/#comment-9112</link>
		<dc:creator>AndDru1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/#comment-9112</guid>
		<description>The Democrats have offered us the sorriest bunch of candidates ever, and now they say Colbert isn&#039;t &quot;viable&quot;.  I&#039;m actually kind of upset about this, and not just because he would have chose Huck as his running mate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrats have offered us the sorriest bunch of candidates ever, and now they say Colbert isn&#8217;t &#8220;viable&#8221;.  I&#8217;m actually kind of upset about this, and not just because he would have chose Huck as his running mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce, Political Columnist</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/comment-page-1/#comment-9107</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce, Political Columnist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/2007/11/02/the-dream-is-over-for-stephen-colbert/#comment-9107</guid>
		<description>Yes, those mentioned in the full article are truly &quot;viable&quot; indeed ... but lest we not forget how viable is Obama as the voters realize that this guy doesn&#039;t do the Pledge or show respect to the flag (must be his early childhood in a Wahibist Muslim school ya think?

And the most viable candidate of all?  Why the former Co-President Lady Hillary, who will not suffer us to see her looking &quot;glamorous&quot; at 60 in a Vanity Fair photoshoot.

Yes, viability is important indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, those mentioned in the full article are truly &#8220;viable&#8221; indeed &#8230; but lest we not forget how viable is Obama as the voters realize that this guy doesn&#8217;t do the Pledge or show respect to the flag (must be his early childhood in a Wahibist Muslim school ya think?</p>
<p>And the most viable candidate of all?  Why the former Co-President Lady Hillary, who will not suffer us to see her looking &#8220;glamorous&#8221; at 60 in a Vanity Fair photoshoot.</p>
<p>Yes, viability is important indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

