Pre-heating the oven for new power rankings
Posted on October 31st, 2007 at 9:51 am by Jason Wright, EditorAfter last night’s debate, how would you rank the democrats? Did Hillary’s star lose some luster? Fire when ready…
12 Comments
Leave a comment
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
What debate?
All I saw was a soft interview.
Sorry, I didn’t mean debate, I meant nationally televised Halloween custom showcase…
the wife and I watched the debate and it was her frist time seeing one for the democrats. She thought clinton did a good job of answering questions even if she did not give a firm answer. She said at the end, Obama came across as a poor speaker, inexperianced and like a lost kid trying to act tough but scared.
Dodd and Biden she said would make great VP’s and Edwards just seemed sleezy. She thought that Kucinich was a bit one tracked with the limited time he had and thought that Richardson is of intrest but she just can’t explain what it is she does not like.
She is a very undesided voter, and it’s really her first time looking at issues and canidates beyond the headline news.
My feelings are mrs. clinton is smart, well spoken, and does a good job standing up for herself. I also disagree with everything she says, but she says it well. (I have not voted for her twice now, she is my senator, and I look foward to not voting for her in 2008) I think she stood out from Obama and Edwards, but was as good as Dodd and Biden in expressing her ideas.
Hillary, Obama, Edwards. No change.
I thought Hillary waffled more than a Denny’s on Sunday after church lets out.
Pass the syrup.
It doesn’t matter who gets the Democratic nomination. I’m wouldn’t vote for any one of them.. except maybe Gravel as a joke.
I’d say Her Highness has no clothes, but that image is too terrible to contemplate.
Yikes. Pass the barf bag, por favor.
You might consider adding VP rankings this time around, even if it means some people are on both.
Does anyone else see this as the beginning of the end for Hillary. This is the first time she has been attacked in the open like this before. And her response to the attacks or lack of answering questions because of the attack did not make her look good. If this happens on a regular basis until January questions will increasingly mount and inevitability will dimminish. Remember the only Democrats elected to the Presidency in recent history were white southern men that fact is somtimes to easily overlooked.
Romney is giving up on winning Mass in general election. That alone ought to say something
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/11/romney_might_not_contest_massachusetts_in_general_election.php
Sorry first attempt was submitted prematurely
Okay, Hillary got nailed (though I admit I’ve always hated her), but still she was answering a tough question there at the end, and I understand why it caught her. It was a gottcha.
Kucinich (my man) has to be given credit for having the best possible answer regarding the UFO question, and never waffling EVER.
Who really impressed - because Edwards lost as much when he got called on about his lobbying money as he gained by nailing hillary - was Richardson. Richardson, despite the very limited amount of time for talking, hit almost every question out of the park. He came off as the most concerned, most informed, and most READY TO LEAD.