DEM Horses

barackobama.jpg
Barack Obama
 

The Wire

Your E-mail
 

Search PD

 

Popular Posts

 

Derby Gifts



 

Derby Links

PoliticalDerby.com

Because it’s a horserace…

Political Derby back on FoxNews

Posted on July 6th, 2007 at 6:25 pm by PD Administrator

After a month layoff to reconnect with his inner-child and mow the grass, Jason was invited back to Fox News this morning to discuss the latest on campaign 2008. Catch the clip below. (The new power rankings he references are due this weekend.)

Posted in PD in the News, White House-2008 by PD Administrator • 6 comments  6 comments •  Post a comment

« Impressive…for a lunatic

Voters ready to elect a black or woman president - just maybe not these specific ones »

 

6 Comments

  1. Bob on 06.07.2007 at 18:29 (Reply)

    Only $10!?!?! Can I get Nancy’s number? :)

  2. Lisa on 06.07.2007 at 20:20 (Reply)

    Love the tie!

  3. Jason Wright, Editor on 06.07.2007 at 20:42 (Reply)

    Thanks, Lisa, but I’m a married man! Back off! ;)

  4. Troy La Mana on 07.07.2007 at 22:55 (Reply)

    See? I told you Fred would move into second.

    Just wait til 3rd Qtr and he blows the doors off of Rudy in donations.

    I am a bit disapointed that Fred hasn’t announced but he did say Mid-July so we still have another week. I just thought the 4th would have been the perfect day to make it offical.

  5. ThatLibertarianGuy on 08.07.2007 at 20:30 (Reply)

    Absolutely ludicrous to put Richardson in 3rd place and Obama in first. Money may be a strong indicator of enthusiasm behind a candidate’s grassroots support, but nothing really sums up a race like the poll numbers.

    Richardson is not ahead of Edwards by any — I repeat, *any* objective measure — not in polling or fundraising. Clinton wipes the floor with Obama in all national polling and primary polling, with the exception of South Carolina, where they’re more or less tied.

    If, as you say, this is about measuring the race at this point in time (and not what you think it will be in three months, when Richardson very well may be in 3rd place), it should be Clinton-Obama-Edwards-Richardson. Predictable, but true. I know you wanted to be exciting and interesting, but it doesn’t make it any less false.

    I’m looking forward to your reasoning behind this.

    GOP side is fine.

  6. Bob on 09.07.2007 at 19:55 (Reply)

    Sure, Hillary leads in polling, as in name recognition, but Obama beat her by 10 mil. That’s no chump chnage. Obama’s got some energy right now.

Leave a comment


You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.