<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Force is weak in this one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/</link>
	<description>Latest National PD Composite: Romney 41.9%  -  Gingrich 24.5%  -  Santorum  21.0%  -  Paul 12.6%</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:10:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatLibertarianGuy</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5015</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatLibertarianGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/#comment-5015</guid>
		<description>Haha! I like to call people schmucks. Also fools and roaches. Shut up, Stephen. I just thought the tone was a little immature. 

(PS -- to whoever clears through the comments, I don&#039;t know if you track by IP address or whatever, since this isn&#039;t regulated, but it really is me, it&#039;s just from another computer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! I like to call people schmucks. Also fools and roaches. Shut up, Stephen. I just thought the tone was a little immature. </p>
<p>(PS &#8212; to whoever clears through the comments, I don&#8217;t know if you track by IP address or whatever, since this isn&#8217;t regulated, but it really is me, it&#8217;s just from another computer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5014</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/#comment-5014</guid>
		<description>Mr. Editor,

So now we&#039;ve resorted to calling our loyal readers schmucks?  Has it really gotten that bad. Perhaps you need another trip to Peru?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Editor,</p>
<p>So now we&#8217;ve resorted to calling our loyal readers schmucks?  Has it really gotten that bad. Perhaps you need another trip to Peru?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Wright, Editor</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Wright, Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/#comment-5010</guid>
		<description>Reconsider the tone and name calling? That&#039;s what makes PD stand out! Without that we&#039;re just another boring political site, you schmuck :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reconsider the tone and name calling? That&#8217;s what makes PD stand out! Without that we&#8217;re just another boring political site, you schmuck <img src='http://politicalderby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewYorkStateConservative</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5005</link>
		<dc:creator>NewYorkStateConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/#comment-5005</guid>
		<description>I, for one, love the post.
Although the only thing I can think of that ties it to the presidential election is the fact that the next president will most likely make at least one or two supreme court nominations- and that the decessions made by the next president&#039;s Supreme Court appointess will effect the nation for years to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, love the post.<br />
Although the only thing I can think of that ties it to the presidential election is the fact that the next president will most likely make at least one or two supreme court nominations- and that the decessions made by the next president&#8217;s Supreme Court appointess will effect the nation for years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatLibertarianGuy</title>
		<link>http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/comment-page-1/#comment-5004</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatLibertarianGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 18:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalderby.com/2007/05/31/the-force-is-weak-in-this-one/#comment-5004</guid>
		<description>Well...this post makes some really good points, but I don&#039;t see what this has to do with the 2008 Presidential Race. It also seems a little rant-like, maybe you should reconsider the tone and the name-calling? Everything you&#039;ve posted so far seems a little hysterical (as in hysterics, not humorous), even when it is correct...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;this post makes some really good points, but I don&#8217;t see what this has to do with the 2008 Presidential Race. It also seems a little rant-like, maybe you should reconsider the tone and the name-calling? Everything you&#8217;ve posted so far seems a little hysterical (as in hysterics, not humorous), even when it is correct&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

